Keeping the Sacred Flame

A place to discuss the religion and philosophy of the Sacred Flame, HeartShadow's personal religion. Also random other thoughts of HeartShadow's as she feels like posting them.

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

Dichotomies of Pleasure and Happiness

Humanity has always had a love-hate relationship with pleasure, especially "fleshy" pleasures, or pleasures of the body. On the one hand, pleasure is enjoyable and sought after, and for good reason. Every pleasure that the human body has comes with advantages, within reason. On the other hand, though, is the problem that pleasure, in and of itself, does nothing. It is an end, as opposed to happiness, which is more often a product of life.

Pleasure and happiness are often confused, considered similar if not the same thing. But pleasure is like a paper: thrown into our Flame, it gives a great flash of warmth, but is then gone, leaving us colder than before. Happiness is a log, placed carefully in our Flame. No great heat, no moment of astonished warmth, but a long growth of warmth that lasts as long as it is nurtured.

Of course, the flash of pleasure is more dramatic, more noticeable. It's much easier to seek, and indeed a search for pleasure may well be genetic, as well as the desire for happiness. But pleasure is easy, too easy. When sweets were hard to come by, sugar was a pleasure that could be safely indulged in, were there enough money to afford it. But over-saturation cheapens pleasure, like taking an occasional piece of chocolate and making it a daily habit makes that chocolate taste not nearly as good. As one becomes accustomed to pleasure, old pleasures become boring, no longer enough. So one must seek new pleasures, casting old ones aside in the heedless search for stimulation.

One might ask, so what? What difference does it make if we need to seek new pleasures? If it makes us happy, what's the problem? The problem is, pleasure doesn't lead to happiness. Pleasure leads to desire, and desire leads more often to sorrow than happiness, because everything is wanted and not had. Pleasure and desire are not wrong, but they must be understood for what they are, and weighed against long-term happiness, when one desires what is not had.

In many ways, happiness is learning to desire what it is we already have, as opposed to focusing on that which is out of reach. We consider ourselves happy when we have what we desire, and unhappy when our minds are occupied by thoughts of those things we lack.

Isn't happiness selfish, one might ask? By what right do I have to seek happiness, when I could be doing things, making things, creating wealth, whatever the excuse is. In truth, however, happiness is our gift to the Divine, as well as our gift from the Divine, if we are capable of simply grasping it. What we do and who we are reflects and changes the Divine. When we are happy, when we live simply, having good relations to those around us and the world we live on, we better the world around us and the Divine. Instead of happiness being selfish, it can be the most unselfish thing one can do.

Happiness is not easy, however. It must be maintained, must be nurtured, must be cared for. It is easy for desire to blow through the mind, a mental wind that carries beliefs of inadequacy and false needs, and such winds are hard to dispel. As long as we hold to happiness, however, as our goal, we can help ourselves, and slowly bring this concept to those around us as well, bettering their lives.

Questions:
How does pleasure differ from happiness? How can the desire for both be balanced?
How do we overcome our desire for pleasure?
Why is happiness unselfish? How would you define being truly happy?
Personal thoughts

2 Comments:

  • At 1:57 PM, Blogger Star said…

    I like the chocolate analogy. And to extend it: Not only does the chocolate not taste so wonderful, but also consider the effects of eating chocolate constantly. I think there's a psychological/spiritual parallel to be drawn there too, although I'm not articulate enough just now to actually give it form. Either way, though, I think one risks not only becoming jaded but also falling prey to the effects of gluttony.

    Question for *you*: Is there a legitimate place for not-happiness in our lives? Or is happiness, all the time, something that we should strive for?

    Questions from you:

    1. Again with the problems with language... I understand what you're saying the difference is, and I understood it before I really got into the essay, but I'm having trouble expressing it. The desire for both can be balanced, I think, by exercising moderation. What exactly "moderation" means will vary from person to person, but the main thing is to make sure you don't let the search for pleasure rule your life entirely. Pleasure, like chocolate, is fine (and even good for you, possibly) in limited quantities; it's when you overindulge that you get into trouble.

    2. We don't overcome our desire for pleasure. I don't think we should. Pleasure should not be confused with happiness, but it can help feed happiness, and help remind us of how happy we are. Again, the key is not so much self-denial, but moderation. How to do that... It's an exercise in willpower, I suppose. I have yet to figure out how to build that.

    3. Let's start from the opposite perspective and work our way around to what you actually asked. *G* So happiness is selfish, and you don't want to do anything selfish, but want to help other people feel happy, right? So you help someone find happiness--let's take a cliche example and say you introduce two people who wind up falling in love and getting married. When you attend the wedding, as you're watching your two friends get married, what do you feel? (Barring extenuating circumstances.)

    And that's why happiness is not selfish. Because when you try to give it to others, it often winds up spilling over on you too. Likewise, when you are happy, you can share it with others and spread the happiness.

    And I'm sorry, Shad, but I doubt you'll ever get a coherent definition of "true happiness" out of me. :) It's too emotional a concept; it does not submit to words. The closest I can come... is moments when I've been perfectly happy. Not jump-for-joy ecstatic; that's closer to pleasure, I think. Perfect happiness... Is closer to peace, I think, than to joy. Those moments for me often involve being curled up with Tim, in bed or on the couch, with at least one sleepy, purring kitty curled up on us--but that's not all of the moment. There's something of the essence of it which I just can't describe. It's just... perfect.

     
  • At 5:13 PM, Blogger Vieva said…

    I don't think it's *possible* to live in a perfect happiness world all the time. Too many things happen to keep us from that.

    OTOH, I don't think there's virtue in non-happiness in and of itself .. one should deal with it and learn from it when it happens, but I don't think it's something that is *necessary*. More like inevitable.

    I think that being able to approach each day with a certain calm serenity of joy .. has virtue. When you can take what life throws at you and recognize it for what it holds .. I think there's virtue there, although I don't know how to put it into words.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home